FeaturesOutreach with approval
Run the process

The message cites their career, and goes out with your sign-off.

An invitation, direct message or InMail drafted in your voice, referencing something real from that person’s path, and sent from your account, after you approve it.

The problem

Why this exists

How it works today

A template with the name swapped gets the response rate of a template with the name swapped. And the person receiving it can tell from the first line: a good recruiter loses credibility over a bad automated message.

How it works with EVO

The message is born from the analysis of that candidate: it cites what they actually did, in the voice you configured for the role, within the character limit of the right channel.

How it works

Outreach with approval from the inside

1The draft

It writes, you read, and only then does it go.

The default mode is approval: nothing goes out without you seeing it. You edit whatever you want, or have it generate again. Anyone who gains confidence in the voice can switch on automatic mode later.

The channel is inferred from the situation: an invitation with a note if you are not connected, a direct message if you are, InMail when it makes sense, and you can change it.

The voice is configured per role, in your own words: "direct and informal, focus on the interesting problem, avoid corporate jargon, sign off as Cleyton".
Outreach · draft for approval
JF
Juliana FerrazMatch 87
Group Product Manager · Nubank
✎ Draft
Suggested channel: Connection request + note
"Juliana, I saw your path from PM to GPM with discovery genuinely practiced at QuintoAndar, iFood and Nubank, three very different contexts where the thread connecting them is user research. We are opening a team here to build discovery from scratch, reporting straight to the CPO. Up for a coffee so I can tell you about it?"
287 / 300 characters
2The conversation

The reply arrives in the same place.

EVO reads the inbox and brings replies into the process, with the history of the conversation. Chained follow-ups can be generated from what the person answered.

When LinkedIn refuses a send, a weekly limit reached for instance, that shows up as an explicit failure with the reason, not as silence.

Hunters · paired agents
3Hunters
2Online
1Offline
HR
Helena R.
MacBook · heartbeat 8s ago
● online
CE
Cleyton E.
Windows · heartbeat 12s ago
● online
RM
Rafael M.
last heartbeat 2h ago
○ offline
Pairing code

A7X-9KQ2

single use · expires in 10 minutes

Under the hood

Sent by you, within your limits

Sending a message in someone’s name is the product’s highest-trust operation. These are the guarantees.

approveApproval mode is the default; automatic is a deliberate opt-in
accountThe send leaves from your account, through your Chrome, never from a server
capDaily limit and time window set by you, respected by the queue
neverLinkedIn’s limits are never circumvented: if the platform refuses, EVO reports it and waits
salaryThe candidate’s salary estimate never appears in the message
What comes next

How it fits into the rest of the journey

Bring a role that is hard to fill

It takes a real role to see EVO work, not a canned example.

Start using it