FeaturesVisual journey
Run the process

Design the process the way it really is.

Stages on a canvas, with parallel groups and transitions by outcome. An external interviewer scores through a portal of their own, with no access to the rest of the system.

The problem

Why this exists

How it works today

The process lives in someone’s head and in a spreadsheet. Nobody knows what stage each candidate is at without asking, and when the process changes midway, candidates already in it end up in limbo.

How it works with EVO

The flow is explicit and visual. Each candidate carries a snapshot of the process as it was when they entered: changing the journey does not move the ground under those already walking it.

How it works

Visual journey from the inside

1The design

Stages, parallels, and what happens on each outcome.

Drag the stages, group the ones that happen in parallel, define where people go when they pass and when they do not. The system validates the graph before letting you save.

A journey can be a global template, a default for that client, or an instance for that role alone, without duplicating everything on each use.

Whoever enters a journey carries a snapshot of it. You can redesign the process tomorrow without disrupting the candidates already inside.
Role journey · builder
5 stages · 1 parallel group✓ Valid graph
Phone screenRecruiter · 30 minPASSEDTechnical interviewTech lead · 60 minPASSEDparallelCulturalCase studyALL_PASSEDNegotiationRecruiter + HM
Transitions by outcome · a failure at any stage ends the journey (fail-fast) · the candidate carries a snapshot of the graph, so changes never alter processes already running
2The execution

Outside assessors get in only where they are needed.

The technical interviewer who is not in HR gets an email invitation and scores in a portal of their own, seeing only the candidate and their stage. Nothing else in the system.

Scheduling with a calendar invitation, an EVO assessment per stage alongside the human one, and the candidate’s timeline filling in as they advance.

Interview sheet · João Lima · technical stage
Question from the guide · Continuous discovery

Tell me about a product decision you changed after talking to a user. What did you believe before, and what changed your mind?

Rubric of anchors
FairCites research, but the decision had already been made
PartialChanged the solution; did not change the understanding of the problem
SuperiorReframed the problem and shows the cost of having pushed on
🎯 Probe generated from this candidate's gaps

"Your assessment flags discovery without an impact metric. In the case you just described, what changed in the numbers afterwards?"

Under the hood

The external portal is the most sensitive surface, and the most tested

Giving access to someone outside the organization is where a mistake turns into a leak. That is why it has its own treatment in the isolation suite.

scopeThe external assessor sees only the candidate and the stage they were invited for
listAccess by email allowlist, with no account in the system
testThe isolation suite has dedicated blocks for the journey, the interview sheet and the external portal
icsCalendar invitation in the open standard, with optional Google Calendar integration
What comes next

How it fits into the rest of the journey

Bring a role that is hard to fill

It takes a real role to see EVO work, not a canned example.

Start using it